
Bungoma KUPPET branch leader Mr. Agustin Luketelo during the announcement of SWAL reversal
Background on Salary Deductions
In July, thousands of teachers across Kenya were shocked to find unexplained deductions on their payslips, sparking nationwide outrage. The controversial levy, listed as KUPPET SWAL, was introduced just weeks after the signing of the much-anticipated Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) that was supposed to uplift teachers’ earnings. Instead of relief, educators were met with a financial blow, as the deductions were implemented without prior notice, official explanation, or clear legal basis — leaving many questioning both the legitimacy and intent behind the move. Learn more about what KUPPET SWAL means and why teachers are protesting here.
The timeline of events leading up to these salary cuts is critical for understanding the broader context. After the CBA was signed, there was an expectation among teachers that their terms of employment would improve, reflecting their hard work and dedication. However, the subsequent deductions were not communicated effectively, resulting in feelings of betrayal and distrust among the teaching staff. Many educators believed that these cuts were unjustified and poorly timed, especially considering the backdrop of ongoing discussions surrounding salary enhancements.

Immediate concerns have emerged regarding the motivations behind the deductions, with teachers fearing that they might be an attempt to raise funds for Kuppet, the Kenya Union of Post-Primary Education Teachers. This situation has not only triggered a sense of financial insecurity but has also raised questions about the transparency of the union and its allocation of resources. Teachers are rightly seeking clarity on how these deductions align with their rights and expectations as outlined in the CBA.
As the situation develops, it remains crucial for all stakeholders to participate in open dialogues to ensure that the interests of educators are safeguarded. Addressing these concerns promptly can help restore trust and maintain morale among the teaching workforce, reinforcing the fundamental need for fair treatment regarding salary matters within the sector.
Teachers’ Concerns and Reactions
In recent weeks, the decision to implement salary cuts for teachers in Bungoma has sparked considerable outrage among the educational community. Educators have voiced their concerns regarding what they perceive as excessive and unjustified deductions from their pay. Many have expressed their frustration towards the Teachers Service Commission (TSC) and the Kenya Union of Post Primary Education Teachers (KUPPET), alleging a significant erosion of trust between teachers and these institutions. The situation has raised questions about the rationale behind the cuts and the lack of communication regarding the measures.
Teachers have articulated their dissatisfaction through various channels, with direct quotes revealing the depth of their feelings. One teacher expressed, “These cuts have come as a shock, and it feels like a betrayal from the TSC, which we relied on for support. Our salaries are already stretched thin, and these deductions only add to our financial burden.” Such sentiments are shared widely, highlighting the psychological and economic stress these cuts cause within teaching staff.
The negative impact on teachers’ livelihoods cannot be overstated. Many educators are now reconsidering their financial stability, worried about meeting basic needs and obligations in light of diminished pay. For instance, a teacher stated, “I depend on my monthly salary to support my family. These cuts mean I must make difficult choices, such as forgoing necessities.” This reflects a broader trend as educators on both a personal and collective level find themselves questioning their future in the profession. Such reactions underscore the urgent need for dialogue between teachers and the TSC to address these grievances and restore confidence in the systems meant to support them. Ensuring transparency is critical to rebuilding trust and fostering a supportive environment for teachers across the region.
Agustin Luketelo’s Assurance and Future Plan
Agustin Luketelo, the branch executive secretary general, recently provided vital updates regarding the financial conditions of teachers in Bungoma. He confirmed that the recent salary deductions imposed on teachers will be fully refunded next month, relieving concerns over the impact of these cuts on their financial stability. Luketelo emphasized that the union is committed to protecting salary increments and ensuring that teachers are compensated fairly and on time, providing assurance to the educational community that their earnings will be prioritized.

In light of recent discussions regarding a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), Luketelo firmly dismissed claims that suggested any agreement undermined the financial well-being of teachers. He reassured educators that the integrity of their Sacco savings is intact, and that proactive measures are being taken to safeguard their financial interests. It is crucial that teachers feel secure in their roles, and Luketelo’s statements underscore the union’s dedication to maintaining an environment that promotes financial confidence among its members.
Looking toward the future, Luketelo articulated a vision for the union that includes the establishment of sub-county offices aimed at enhancing communication and support for educators at a local level. These offices will serve as strategic points of contact for teachers, facilitating access to resources and information. Additionally, Luketelo discussed other developmental initiatives that are being planned to empower teachers and foster a collaborative environment. This proactive approach signals a commitment to continuous improvement within the educational framework, ultimately benefiting the teachers and the students they serve.
Broader Implications for Teacher Unions
The announcement by Luketel regarding the reversal of the July pay cuts for teachers in Bungoma carries significant implications for teacher unions across the region. One of the primary concerns raised by this development is the impact it has on accountability and transparency within the unions, particularly as they relate to collective bargaining agreements (CBAs). These agreements are crucial as they define the terms of employment, pay, and working conditions for teachers. The effective management of these agreements requires not only clear communication from union leadership but also a commitment to uphold the principles of transparency. Failure to do so could erode the trust between educators and their representatives, leading to discord and unrest within the ranks of the teaching profession.
Moreover, with the impending union elections set for 2026, the dynamics within teacher unions will be under intense scrutiny. Candidates, such as Luketelo who are perceived to support the best interests of the teachers, may gain significant traction, particularly with endorsements from influential groups like the Bungoma Queens. Their support could play a pivotal role in shaping the direction of the union, focusing on a more responsive leadership that prioritizes the needs of educators. It highlights the intersection of political influence and educational policies within union contexts and the necessity for leaders to champion transparency in negotiations and financial decisions.
Ultimately, navigating these challenges will require strategic foresight and a commitment to enhancing collaboration between educators and union officials. By addressing teachers’ concerns and fostering an environment of accountability, the unions can work towards rebuilding trust. A transparent approach not only helps in maintaining teacher morale but is also essential for ensuring that collective bargains meet the evolving needs of the education sector. This trust is paramount for the durability of teacher unions moving forward, especially as they face the trials of upcoming elections and larger educational reforms.