Teachers in Machakos County are raising serious concerns about the Kenya Union of Post-Primary Education Teachers (KUPPET), accusing the union of failing to involve them in critical decisions and imposing unexplained payslip deductions. The recently signed 2025–2029 Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) has also come under scrutiny, with educators claiming they were sidelined in negotiations.
As frustrations grow, many teachers are demanding transparency from KUPPET leadership, particularly regarding salary increments and the sudden appearance of deductions labeled “KUPPET Welfare,” “Solidarity Fund,” and “Union Levy Adjustments.”
1. Lack of Consultation in the CBA
Teachers in Machakos allege that KUPPET signed the 2025–2029 CBA without proper consultations at the grassroots level. Many claim they only learned about the salary adjustments through media reports, with no breakdown of how the increments were calculated.
“We only saw the salary increments in the media. No one came to explain how it was arrived at or whether our job group concerns were addressed,” — a teacher from Kangundo.
This lack of engagement has left many questioning whether KUPPET ASAL (KUPPET’s branch for Arid and Semi-Arid regions) truly represents their interests.
2. Mysterious Payslip Deductions
Several teachers have reported unexplained deductions on their payslips, ranging from KSh 300 to KSh 600 monthly, under vague categories like “KUPPET Welfare” and “Solidarity Fund.”
“We’re being deducted up to KSh 600 monthly in the name of welfare or special levies. We don’t even know where that money goes,” — a teacher in Mwala Sub-County.
While some deductions may be legitimate, the absence of clear communication has fueled suspicions, with many demanding an audited financial report from the union.
3. Ignored Feedback and Unresponsive Leadership
Teachers accuse KUPPET officials of being dismissive when concerns are raised. Some claim that after election campaigns, union leaders become inaccessible, leaving members frustrated.
“When elections come, they campaign and promise change. But once they’re elected, they only speak in Nairobi,” — another teacher.
This disconnect has led to growing disillusionment, with many educators feeling that KUPPET union leadership prioritizes Nairobi-based decisions over grassroots needs.
4. KUPPET’s Defense: Deductions Serve a Purpose
Efforts to reach Machakos KUPPET branch officials for comment were unsuccessful. However, an unnamed KUPPET official defended the deductions, stating:
“Every deduction serves a purpose—either for welfare emergencies, bereavement support, or national events. Teachers should engage the union instead of turning to social media.”
While the explanation may hold merit, the lack of open dialogue has only deepened mistrust among members.
5. Teachers’ Demands: What Machakos Educators Want
Frustrated teachers are now calling for:
✔ A detailed breakdown of the 2025–2029 CBA benefits per job group.
✔ Clear communication on all payslip deductions.
✔ Audited financial reports for accountability.
✔ Suspension of unexplained deductions until proper sensitization is done.
✔ Better grassroots representation in union decisions.
Without these changes, many fear that KUPPET’s credibility will continue to erode.
Conclusion: A Union at Risk of Losing Trust
The discontent among Machakos teachers highlights a growing rift between KUPPET and its members. If the union fails to address these concerns—especially regarding CBA transparency and payslip deductions—it risks losing the confidence of the very educators it represents.
For now, teachers are watching closely, hoping for accountability before frustrations boil over.
What’s Your Experience?
Have you faced similar issues with KUPPET deductions or the 2025–2029 CBA? Share your thoughts in the comments or reach out to us. Let’s keep the conversation going!
