
TSC acting CEO during the 2025-2029 CBA negotiations at Kise
The Shift from Career Progression Guidelines
The education sector in Kenya has long faced challenges regarding the promotion systems for teachers. One of the most significant sources of discontent has been the Career Progression Guidelines (CPG). Established with the intent to provide a structured path for career advancement, the CPG has been widely criticized for its failure to deliver timely promotions, leading to a growing sense of frustration among educators. Many teachers have voiced their concerns over the inefficiencies of the current system, which has adversely affected their professional growth and motivation to enhance educational standards.
Recent findings from a survey conducted by the Kenya National Union of Teachers (Knut) shed light on the seriousness of the situation. According to the survey results published in 2024, a staggering 68% of teachers reported experiencing delays of over five years in their promotion applications. This alarming statistic underscores the pressing need for reform within the promotion framework, as these delays can lead to decreased morale among educators and can hinder the overall quality of education delivered to students. Teachers have shared poignant testimonies about the emotional toll these delays have taken on their careers, often resulting in feelings of being undervalued and unappreciated.

The dissatisfaction with the CPG has prompted various stakeholders in the education sector to call for a more robust and efficient promotion system. As part of the efforts to create a more equitable environment for teachers, the Teacher Service Commission (TSC) has announced plans to implement a new promotion system starting in 2025. This upcoming shift aims to address the shortcomings of the CPG and establish a framework that not only promotes timely advancements but also recognizes educators’ merits more effectively. The proposed changes are expected to foster a more supportive atmosphere where teachers can thrive and contribute positively to the education landscape in Kenya.
Understanding the Failures of the CPG
The Career Progression Guidelines (CPG) have faced significant criticism and scrutiny in recent years, arising from a host of shortcomings that have led to widespread dissatisfaction among educators. Central to the failures of the CPG are its bureaucratic processes, which have proven to be not only convoluted but also impersonal. Many teachers have expressed frustration over the rigid framework that the CPG established, often resulting in a prolonged and opaque promotional process that left them feeling undervalued and overlooked.
One educator summarized the sentiment among their peers by stating, “The CPG has made me feel like just another number in a system that prioritizes paperwork over people.” This quote encapsulates a pervasive feeling among many in the teaching community—that the guidelines failed to recognize their individual contributions. Such sentiments were echoed in survey data, which revealed that over 70% of respondents felt that the CPG did not fairly reflect their achievements or potential for advancement. The rigid adherence to rules and policies only stifled creativity and innovation, which are crucial components of effective teaching.
Furthermore, the emphasis on compliance and documentation created a significant administrative burden on teachers. Many reported spending considerable time navigating the promotion process rather than focusing on their primary objective—enhancing student learning outcomes. As one respondent noted, “Instead of nurturing my professional growth, the CPG turned my career into a tedious exercise in paperwork.” This discontent has contributed to a sense of disillusionment, illustrating that the CPG not only impacted individual careers but also the overall morale within the educational environment.
As these issues came to the forefront, it became clear that a reevaluation of the promotion system was necessary. Analyzing feedback from educators highlighted the urgent need for a transparent system that values and recognizes the actual contributions of teaching professionals, setting the stage for a more effective and responsive promotion system to be implemented in 2025.
The Components of TSC’s New Promotion System
In 2025, the Teacher Service Commission (TSC) will implement a new promotion system designed to improve teacher evaluation and career progression. This system features three main pillars: Classroom Performance, Professional Development, and Leadership, each serving a distinct function in assessing a teacher’s overall effectiveness.
The first pillar, Classroom Performance, represents 50% of a teacher’s promotion eligibility. This critical component emphasizes metrics that reflect the direct impact teachers have on student learning. Evaluation methods will include student improvement scores and observations of classroom lessons. By focusing on tangible outcomes and the observation of teaching practices, TSC strives to create a fair assessment that accounts for individual teaching styles and their effectiveness in fostering student engagement and outcomes.
The second pillar, Professional Development, accounts for 30% of the promotion criteria. This element recognizes the importance of continuous growth in the teaching profession. To be eligible for promotion, teachers must engage in ongoing training and adhere to the Teacher Professional Development (TPD) compliance requirements. Moreover, obtaining additional certifications will play a significant role in this evaluation. This focus on professional development aligns with the notion that an effective educator is one who is committed to lifelong learning and adapting to the evolving educational landscape.
Lastly, the Leadership component encompasses the various roles a teacher may assume beyond the classroom environment. This part of the promotion system aims to acknowledge teachers who take on leadership responsibilities such as mentoring colleagues, participating in school committees, or leading extracurricular activities. By recognizing these diverse contributions, the TSC’s new promotion system seeks to foster a more holistic evaluation of teacher performance, ultimately elevating the status and impact of educators in the education sector.
Implications and Future Outlook for Teachers
The implementation of the new promotion system in 2025 heralds a significant shift in the landscape for teachers in Kenya. This innovative approach is designed to enhance teacher morale while simultaneously creating avenues for career advancement. By linking promotions to performance metrics, the system is expected to cultivate a culture of accountability and excellence within the teaching profession. Teachers will be encouraged to engage in continuous professional development, as their career progression will be closely tied to their educational impact on students.
One of the key implications of this new system is the emphasis on transparency and fairness in the assessment process. The K-CEP (Kenya’s Continuous Education Improvement Program) will likely require robust mechanisms to evaluate teacher performance objectively. This includes leveraging various assessment tools to ensure that evaluations are comprehensive and reflect the diverse capabilities of educators. However, the challenge will lie in mitigating any perceptions of bias or favoritism that may arise during this implementation stage. Establishing clear guidelines and involving teachers in the decision-making process will be crucial for fostering trust in the system.
Furthermore, the outlook for the future of teaching in Kenya appears promising. As teachers find motivation in performance-based rewards, enhanced job satisfaction may follow, translating into improved educational outcomes for students. The anticipation is that teachers who feel valued and recognized for their contributions will ultimately invest more deeply in their roles. In the long run, as this promotion system takes root, it has the potential to not only elevate teaching standards but also to contribute positively to the overall quality of education in the country. The systemic reforms aim to empower educators, reaffirming their pivotal role in shaping the nation’s future through education.
It’s a good move to some of us who work very hard but feel sidelined as no one recognizes our input